Rational Drug Utilization in Geriatric Patients: A Systematic Review of Prescribing Practices, Polypharmacy, and Medication Safety.
Background: Rational drug utilization in older adults is complicated by multimorbidity, age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes, frailty, impaired renal and hepatic function, cognitive decline, and treatment by multiple prescribers. Although the use of several medicines may be clinically justified, inappropriate polypharmacy increases the risks of adverse drug reactions, drug–drug interactions, falls, hospitalization, functional decline, non-adherence, and treatment burden. Objective: To systematically review prescribing practices, the prevalence and consequences of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication use, and the effectiveness of medication-review, deprescribing, pharmacist-led, and electronic decision-support interventions in geriatric patients. Methods: This systematic review was structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were considered for studies published from January 2000 to January 2026. Eligible reports involved adults aged 60 years or older and evaluated polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications, prescribing omissions, adverse drug events, medication review, deprescribing, pharmacist-led interventions, or electronic clinical decision support. The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, STOPP/START criteria, and Medication Appropriateness Index were considered major prescribing-assessment frameworks. Owing to heterogeneity in study populations, settings, interventions, and outcomes, the evidence was synthesized narratively. Results: Fifteen key reports published between 2011 and 2023 were included in the principal evidence synthesis. These comprised 5 randomized or cluster-randomized intervention trials, 7 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 3 expert-consensus or prescribing-criteria publications. The 5 major intervention trials included at least 8,608 older adults. An Indian systematic review of 27 studies reported pooled prevalences of 49% for polypharmacy, 31% for hyperpolypharmacy, and 28% for potentially inappropriate medication use. Frequently implicated medicines included benzodiazepines and related hypnotics, anticholinergic drugs, antipsychotics, proton-pump inhibitors without a continuing indication, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, sulfonylureas, duplicate cardiovascular therapy, and medicines requiring renal-dose adjustment. STOPP/START-guided review, pharmacist participation, and structured deprescribing generally improved medication appropriateness and reduced potentially inappropriate medication exposure. Thirteen of 14 randomized deprescribing reports documented reductions in medicine number or dosage without evidence of major safety harm. The MedSafer trial included 5,698 patients across 11 Canadian hospitals and increased deprescribing but did not significantly reduce 30-day adverse drug events. The OPERAM trial included 2,008 multimorbid older adults and did not significantly reduce drug-related hospital admissions. Electronic recommendations in the SENATOR trial did not clearly reduce adverse drug reactions, partly because of limited implementation. Conclusions: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing are common among geriatric patients and contribute to medication-related harm. Structured medication review, STOPP/START and Beers Criteria screening, pharmacist involvement, deprescribing, medication reconciliation, and electronic decision support improve prescribing-process outcomes, although their effects on mortality, hospitalization, falls, and quality of life remain inconsistent. Rational drug utilization should not focus solely on reducing medicine numbers. Each medicine should have a clear indication, clinically meaningful expected benefit, appropriate dose and duration, acceptable risk, feasible monitoring, and consistency with the patient’s frailty, life expectancy, functional status, and treatment preferences.