Background: Anaemia is a prevalent condition among geriatric patients, associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and reduced quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical profile, etiological factors, and complications of anaemia in elderly individuals at a tertiary care centre. Methods: A prospective, hospital-based observational study was conducted over two years, involving 2700 patients aged >60 years with anaemia (haemoglobin <13 g/dL in males, <12 g/dL in females). Data collection included detailed clinical history, physical examination, laboratory investigations (complete blood count, peripheral smear, iron studies, etc.), and radiological assessments. Anaemia severity was graded as mild (10.1–13 g/dL), moderate (7–10 g/dL), or severe (<7 g/dL). Statistical analysis assessed associations between variables. Results: The mean age was 67.81 ± 4.51 years, with 67.96% in the 61–70 years group and a female predominance (59.56%). Generalized weakness (30.04%) was the most common symptom, followed by breathlessness (20.41%). Radiological findings highlighted chronic kidney disease (29.93%) and acute kidney disease (29.11%). Moderate anaemia predominated (74.59%), with normocytic normochromic at 32% and normocytic hypochromic pattern at 32%, followed by microcytic hypochromic pattern at 21%. Nutritional anaemia (30.81%) was the leading cause, followed by chronic kidney disease (29.92%). Peripheral smear findings showed a significant association with anaemia severity (p < 0.0001), but no significant links with age or gender. Conclusion: Anaemia in geriatric patients is multifaceted, primarily driven by nutritional deficiencies and chronic diseases like kidney and liver disorders. Early screening and targeted interventions are crucial to mitigate functional decline and improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
The elderly, traditionally defined as individuals aged 60 or older, are further categorized as "early elderly" (60-74 years) and "late elderly" (75 years and above)1
Despite longer life expectancies, there is limited evidence that today's elderly enjoy better health than previous generations, particularly regarding mild to moderate disability, where changes have been minimal over the last three decades. While added years in good health would allow older adults to maintain similar activity levels to younger people, these extra years are often accompanied by declines in physical and mental health. Such declines can have significant implications for both individuals and society, underscoring the need for proactive attitudes and actions toward the aging population2.
Elderly patients with anemia are heterogeneous in terms of clinical history, coexisting medical conditions, and concomitant medication use than young adults. In elderly, anemia is associated with poor performance status, increased frailty, dementia, depression, reduced mobility, increased risk of falls, and poor quality of life3.
Anemia is frequently overlooked in older adults, despite strong evidence showing that low hemoglobin levels are often a sign of physiological decline in this population. Numerous studies have identified anemia as an independent risk factor associated with increased morbidity and mortality, as well as a decreased quality of life among community-dwelling older adults4.
The present study was undertaken with the aim of evaluating the clinical profile of anaemia in geriatric patients. The objectives were to study both the clinical features and laboratory parameters of each patient, to identify the factors associated with anaemia, and to assess the effects and complications arising due to anaemia in this population.
Study Area
The present study was carried out in the Department of General Medicine at a tertiary care hospital (Government Medical College, Latur).
Study Design
A prospective, hospital-based observational study was conducted over a period of two years following Institutional Ethical Committee approval.
Study Population
Patients aged above 60 years, attending the hospital and diagnosed with anaemia, were included in the study as per the defined criteria. Anaemia was diagnosed when hemoglobin levels were less than 13 g/dl in males and less than 12 g/dl in females.
Inclusion Criteria
Method of Data Collection
Each participant was evaluated with detailed clinical history and thorough examination. Sociodemographic details, past medical history, medication use, smoking and alcohol status, dietary habits, physical activity, and family history of major illnesses were recorded.
Blood and other relevant samples were collected for laboratory investigations. The severity, clinical and etiological profile, as well as complications of anaemia, were assessed in all patients. All findings were recorded in a structured case record form.
The following investigations were carried out for each patient as per protocol:
Sample Size
The prevalence of anaemia in the geriatric population in India is approximately 36%. The sample size was calculated using the formula:
n=Z2×p×qL2n=L2Z2×p×q
Where,
Accordingly, the minimum required sample size was 2730. Over the study duration of two years, a total of 2700 geriatric anaemia patients were recruited and analyzed.
Figure 1: Distribution according to age group
Figure and table showsdistribution of 2700 patients The majority1835 (68%) are in the 61-70 age group. That's a significant portion. Then the 71-80 group is about 759 (28%), which is still a decent chunk. The over 80s are only 4%, which is quite small. Mean67.81 4.51 years.
Figure 2: Distribution according to gender
This tableindicates that out of the total 2,700 patients, 40.44% are male and 59.56% are female. In other words, there are more female patients (1,608) compared to male patients (1,092) in this dataset.
Figure 3 Distribution according to Clinical presentation
This data illustrates the distribution of various clinical presentations among the 2,700 patients. The most common clinical presentation is generalized weakness, affecting 811 (30.04% )of the patients. Breathlessness is the second most common presentation, found in 20.41% (551)of the patients. Giddiness and chronic kidney disease are also relatively common, present in381 (14.11%) and 330 (12.22%) of the patients, respectively. Other presentations, such as abdominal pain280 (10.37%), loss of weight 208 (7.70%), and loss of appetite35 (1.30%), are less common.
Figure 4 Distribution according to Radiological Findings.
This data illustrates the distribution of various radiological findings among the 2,700 patients. Radiological investigations performed being ultrasonography and C.T. Scan as and when necessary. The most common condition is chronic kidney disease, affecting 808 (29.93%) of the patients, followed closely by acute kidney disease (Bilateral kidney disease), which affects (786) 29.11% of the patients. Fatty liver is the third most common condition, found in(18.74%) of the patients. Cirrhosis and splenomegaly are present in 353 (13.07%) and 247 (9.15%) of the patients, respectively.
Table 1: Anaemia Grading and Hb Levels
|
Grading of Anaemia |
n (%) |
Hb Levels (gm/dl) |
n (%) |
|
Mild anaemia |
626 (23.19%) |
10.1 – 13 |
626 (23.19%) |
|
Moderate anaemia |
2014 (74.59%) |
7 – 10 |
2014 (74.59%) |
|
Severe anaemia |
60 (2.22%) |
<7 |
60 (2.22%) |
|
Total |
2700 (100%) |
Total |
2700 (100%) |
Nearly three-fourths of the patients (74.6%) had moderate anaemia, with corresponding Hb levels between 7–10 gm/dl. Severe cases (<7 gm/dl Hb) comprised only 2.2%.
Figure 5 Distribution according to Peripheral Smear finding
This data illustrates that the most common peripheral smear findings are normocytic normochromic and normocytic hypochromic anaemia, each affecting 32% of the patients. Microcytic hypochromic anaemia is the next most common finding, present in 21% of the patients. Dimorphic anaemia and macrocytic anaemia are less common, affecting 10% and 5% of the patients, respectively.
Table 2: Association between Peripheral Smear Finding and anaemia
|
Peripheral Smear Finding |
TYPE OF ANAEMIA |
Total |
P VALUE |
||
|
Mild Anaemia (23.19%) |
Moderate Anaemia (74.59%) |
Severe Anaemia (2.22%) |
|
||
|
Normocytic Normochromic |
254 |
600 |
10 |
864 |
P <0.0001 highly significant |
|
Normocytic Hypochromic anaemia (NHA) |
144 |
700 |
20 |
864 |
|
|
Microcytic Hypochromic anaemia
|
142 |
400 |
25 |
567 |
|
|
Dimorphic anaemia (DA) |
65 |
200 |
5 |
270 |
|
|
Macrocytic anaemia |
35 |
100 |
0 |
135 |
|
|
TOTAL |
640 |
2000 |
60 |
2700 |
|
The highly significant association (p < 0.0001) highlights that peripheral smear findings are strongly tied to anemia severity.
Figure 6: Distribution according to Causes of Anaemia:
This figure and table shows that most common cause of anaemia in geriatrics patients is kidney related disease. (Chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury )[41.03%].
It is followed by nutritional anaemia [30.81%]. Individually observing, nutritional anaemia is the most common [30.81%], followed by chronic kidney disease [29.92%].Next most common was chronic liver disease [24.07%]. Other causes included Anaemia of chronic disease.
Fig 7: Distribution according to Anaemia in Chronic Diseases:
Table 3: Distribution according to Anaemia in Chronic Diseases:
|
Disease |
Number of patients |
Percentage |
|
Hypothyroidism |
44 |
40% |
|
Osteoarthritis |
29 |
26.36% |
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis |
24 |
21.81% |
|
Hyperthyroidism |
13 |
11.81% |
|
Total
|
110 |
100% |
This table and figure shows distribution of anaemia in chronic diseases. Most common was Hypothyroidism [40%]. Other causes included osteoarthritis [26.36%], rheumatoid arthritis [21.81%] and hyperthyroidism [11.81%].
Anaemia remains a significant health challenge among the geriatric population, closely linked with increased morbidity and mortality. Understanding its clinical, radiological, and haematological profiles is essential for accurate diagnosis and tailored management. In our study, the majority of patients (67.96%) were in the 61–70 year age group, with a mean age of 67.81 ± 4.51 years. This suggests that the younger segment of the geriatric population carries the highest burden of anaemia. Similar findings were reported by Agravatet al.10 . , who identified the 60–69 year group as most commonly affected in their clinico-pathological study. Dr. Surjeet Singh et al.11. also reported a mean age of 67.25 years, with nearly 79% of patients being ≤70 years old. Their study further indicated an association between age and anaemia severity, with younger groups more often presenting mild anaemia, while older patients had a higher prevalence of moderate to severe forms.
With respect to gender distribution, our study identified a predominance among females (59.56%) compared with males (40.44%). This contrasts with the findings of Agravatet al.10. and Alsaeed et al.15, who reported a higher prevalence among males. Conversely, the meta-analysis by Mohammadi et al.12. observed no significant gender-based difference.
In terms of symptomatology, generalised weakness (30.04%) was the most frequent clinical presentation in our cohort, followed by breathlessness (20.41%), giddiness (14.11%), and features of chronic kidney disease (12.22%). These symptoms are consistent with the cardinal features of anaemia described in previous work. Agravatet al.10. reported easy fatigability (88%), dyspnoea (70%), and giddiness (60%) as leading complaints, while Thyagaraja et al.16. described fatigue (70%) and dyspnoea (50%) as predominant.
Radiological findings in our study extended the understanding of systemic involvement. Chronic kidney disease (29.93%) and acute kidney disease (29.11%) were the most frequent abnormalities, followed by fatty liver (18.74%), cirrhosis (13.07%), and splenomegaly (9.15%). While the majority of prior research has concentrated on clinical and haematological variables, Abbasi et al. emphasized the potential diagnostic role of imaging, reporting features such as septal and aortic ring signs in elderly anaemic patients on non-contrast thoracic CT scans. Although they did not focus on hepatosplenic or renal findings, their work underscores the evolving role of radiology in evaluating anaemia. Our data further demonstrates the importance of radiological assessment for uncovering underlying causes in older patients with anaemia.
Haematological evaluation in our study showed that moderate anaemia was the most prevalent (74.59%), with 23.19% presenting with mild and only 2.22% with severe anaemia. Most patients had haemoglobin levels between 7–10 g/dl, reinforcing the predominance of moderate anaemia in this group. Peripheral smear analysis revealed normocytic normochromic and normocytic hypochromic patterns as equally common (32% each), followed by microcytic hypochromic (21%), dimorphic (10%), and macrocytic anaemia (5%). Importantly, there was no significant association between anaemia severity and either age (p > 0.05) or gender (p = 0.991), though a strong correlation was observed between morphological findings and severity (p < 0.0001). These patterns align closely with the observations of Neelima Deshpande et al. (2017) and Alsaeed et al.15, who reported anaemia of chronic disease (ACD) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) as the leading causes, often reflected in normocytic or hypochromic smear findings. Thyagaraja et al.16. further highlighted iron deficiency (36%) and vitamin B12/folate deficiency (24%) as frequent etiologies.
The clinical implications of our findings are substantial. Moderate anaemia was the overwhelming dominant type in this cohort, which is consistent with multiple prior studies. The recognition of normocytic normochromic and hypochromic anaemia as common morphological subtypes highlights their linkage with chronic diseases, particularly renal and liver dysfunction. Moreover, even mild anaemia has been emphasized in prior literature as a predictor of adverse outcomes, supporting the need for timely evaluation and management regardless of severity.
Overall, our study provides a comprehensive evaluation of 2700 patients with anaemia in the geriatric age group. The large sample size, detailed clinical and radiological assessment, and integration of peripheral smear findings contribute new insights into the spectrum of anaemia in older adults. While our results are consistent with much of the available literature, certain variations, especially regarding gender distribution and causes, highlight the influence of regional and population-specific factors. These findings reinforce the critical need for routine anaemia screening and individualized management strategies in elderly patients.
Anaemia represents a major health burden in the geriatric population, with a high prevalence of moderate severity and associations with chronic comorbidities such as kidney and liver diseases. Our comprehensive analysis of 2700 patients underscores the predominance of nutritional anaemia and normocytic morphological patterns, alongside common symptoms like generalized weakness and breathlessness that significantly impair quality of life. While no significant correlations were found between anaemia severity and age or gender, the strong link with peripheral smear findings emphasizes the value of haematological evaluation in guiding management. These insights align with existing literature, highlighting regional variations in gender distribution and etiological profiles, and reinforce the necessity for routine screening, radiological assessments, and individualized treatment strategies to address treatable causes, reduce complications, and enhance functional outcomes in elderly patients. Future research should focus on longitudinal interventions to further elucidate unexplained cases and optimize care in this growing demographic.