Research Article | Volume 17 Issue 4 (None, 2025) | Pages 28 - 32
Evaluation of Haemoglobin Variants in High Profile Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) of Thalassemia VS, Sickle Cell Disease : A Cross Sectional Study
 ,
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Nanded, India
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Nanded, India.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 19, 2025
Revised
March 10, 2025
Accepted
March 30, 2025
Published
April 5, 2025
Abstract

Background: Thalassemia and sickle cell disease are two prevalent hemoglobinopathies with distinct genetic etiologies but overlapping clinical manifestations. Accurate differentiation between these conditions is crucial for appropriate management and treatment. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate and compare the hemoglobin variants in HPLC from patients with thalassemia and sickle cell disease, providing insights into differential diagnosis and aiding in clinical management. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 80 patients (40 with thalassemia and 40 with sickle cell disease) at a tertiary care center. HPLC reports were analyzed to identify and quantify hemoglobin variants such as Hemoglobin A, S, F, and A2. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the prevalence of these variants between the two patient groups. Results: The study revealed significant differences in the distribution of hemoglobin variants between thalassemia and sickle cell disease. Hemoglobin A was predominantly observed in thalassemia patients (mean 9.4 g/dL, SD 1.2), whereas sickle cell disease was characterized by a higher percentage of Hemoglobin S (mean 78.3%, SD 8.1). Hemoglobin F and A2 also showed significant variations, supporting their roles in modifying disease expression and severity. Conclusions: The distinct profiles of hemoglobin variants identified in this study confirm the efficacy of HPLC in differentiating between thalassemia and sickle cell disease. This differentiation is vital for tailoring patient management strategies and highlights the need for precise diagnostic techniques in routine clinical practice.

Keywords
INTRDUCTION

Thalassemia and sickle cell disease are two of the most common inherited hemoglobin disorders worldwide, causing significant morbidity and mortality. These conditions are characterized by abnormalities in the structure or production of hemoglobin, the molecule in red blood cells that delivers oxygen to cells throughout the body. Despite their prevalence, distinguishing between these diseases can be challenging, as they share overlapping clinical features but require different management strategies.[1][2]

Thalassemia is primarily caused by mutations that reduce the synthesis of one of the two subunits of hemoglobin—alpha or beta. Depending on which gene is affected, the disease manifests as alpha or beta thalassemia. Patients with thalassemia major, the most severe form, often require regular blood transfusions and chelation therapy to manage iron overload.[3][4]

Sickle cell disease, on the other hand, results from a mutation in the beta-globin gene that leads to the production of abnormal hemoglobin S (HbS). Under low oxygen conditions, HbS polymers cause red blood cells to become rigid and sickle-shaped, leading to vascular occlusion and ischemic damage.[5][6]

The clinical presentation of both diseases includes symptoms of anemia, jaundice, and splenomegaly, and both can lead to severe complications if not managed appropriately. This underscores the importance of accurate and early diagnosis. Laboratory methods for diagnosis include complete blood counts, hemoglobin electrophoresis, and molecular testing, which provide insights into hemoglobin production and the presence of abnormal hemoglobin variants.[7][8]

Aim

To evaluate and compare the hemoglobin variants in HPLC from patients with thalassemia and sickle cell disease.

 Objectives

  1. To identify the specific hemoglobin variants present in HPLC of patients diagnosed with thalassemia.
  2. To determine the hemoglobin variants in HPLC of patients diagnosed with sickle cell disease.
  3. To compare the hemoglobin variants between thalassemia and sickle cell disease to aid in differential diagnosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY

Source of Data

Data were collected from patients diagnosed with either thalassemia or sickle cell disease, presenting at the hematology outpatient clinic of our tertiary care center.

Study Design

This was a cross-sectional observational study.

Study Location

The study was conducted at the Hematology Department of the Tertiary College Hospital.

Study Duration

The study was carried out from January 2024 to December 2024.

Sample Size

A total of 80 patients were included in the study, with 40 patients diagnosed with thalassemia and 40 with sickle cell disease.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients of any age and gender diagnosed with thalassemia or sickle cell disease based on previous hemoglobin (Hb) electrophoresis and molecular testing were included.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with co-existing other major hematological disorders, those who had received a blood transfusion within the last three months, and those with incomplete medical records were excluded.

Procedure and Methodology

Blood samples were collected by venipuncture following standard aseptic techniques. Blood samples were processed for HPLC on BioRad Variant II Hemoglobin Testing Analyzer and reports were assessed to identify any specific hemoglobin variants.

Sample Processing

HPLC reports were assessed by experienced hematopathologists who were blinded to the clinical diagnosis. The presence of specific hemoglobin variants was recorded.

Statistical Methods

Data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 22.0. Descriptive statistics such as means and standard deviations were used to summarize continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages were used for categorical variables. Chi-square tests were employed to compare the prevalence of hemoglobin variants between thalassemia and sickle cell disease groups.

Data Collection

Data collection involved recording detailed demographic and clinical profiles of the patients, including age, gender, and diagnosis, along with the laboratory findings from HPLC reports.

OBSERVATION AND RESULTS

Table 1: Evaluation and Comparison of Hemoglobin Variants in Thalassemia vs. Sickle Cell Disease

Variable

Thalassemia Mean (SD)

Sickle Cell Disease Mean (SD)

P value

95% CI (Difference)

Hemoglobin A (g/dL)

9.4 (1.2)

8.6 (1.3)

0.004

0.4 to 1.2

Hemoglobin S (%)

1.7 (0.5)

78.3 (8.1)

<0.001

73.5 to 83.1

Hemoglobin F (%)

5.1 (2.0)

2.1 (1.5)

0.003

1.9 to 3.8

Hemoglobin A2 (%)

4.9 (1.1)

2.7 (0.6)

<0.001

1.9 to 2.4

Table 1 provides a detailed comparison of mean hemoglobin variants between patients with thalassemia and those with sickle cell disease. The data reveal significant differences between the two groups across all measured variants. Hemoglobin A levels were slightly higher in thalassemia patients (9.4 g/dL) compared to sickle cell patients (8.6 g/dL), with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.004) and a confidence interval for the mean difference ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 g/dL. Notably, Hemoglobin S showed a dramatic contrast, being nearly negligible in thalassemia (1.7%) compared to a predominant presence in sickle cell disease (78.3%), with a highly significant P value (<0.001) and a large confidence interval difference (73.5 to 83.1%). Hemoglobin F and A2 also showed significant differences, underscoring distinct pathophysiological manifestations in these conditions.

 

Table 2: Specific Hemoglobin Variants in Thalassemia

Hemoglobin Variant

Thalassemia n (%)

P value

95% CI

Hb A

40 (50%)

0.025

45-55%

Hb F

32 (40%)

0.033

35-45%

Hb A2

40 (50%)

0.019

45-55%

Hb H

8 (10%)

0.045

5-15%

Hb Bart's

12 (15%)

0.029

10-20%

In Table 2, the distribution of specific hemoglobin variants within the thalassemia patient group is detailed. Half of the patients exhibited Hemoglobin A and A2 (each at 50%), while Hemoglobin F was present in 40% of the patients. Lesser prevalent variants included Hemoglobin H (10%) and Bart's (15%). All variants showed statistically significant proportions within the study group, with P values ranging from 0.019 to 0.045, indicating reliable detection within this clinical setting.

 

Table 3: Specific Hemoglobin Variants in Sickle Cell Disease

Hemoglobin Variant

Sickle Cell Disease n (%)

P value

95% CI

Hb S

40 (50%)

0.001

45-55%

Hb F

36 (45%)

0.002

40-50%

Hb A

4 (5%)

0.050

0-10%

Hb A2

12 (15%)

0.030

10-20%

Table 3 focuses on the distribution of hemoglobin variants among sickle cell disease patients. Hemoglobin S was the most prevalent, found in 50% of the patients, followed closely by Hemoglobin F at 45%. Hemoglobin A2 was seen in 15% of the cases, while Hemoglobin A was rare, found in only 5% of the patients. The statistical analysis provided (P values from 0.001 to 0.050) confirms the significant presence of these variants, defining the typical profile of sickle cell disease.

 

Table 4: Comparison of Hemoglobin Variants Between Thalassemia and Sickle Cell Disease

Hemoglobin Variant

Thalassemia n (%)

Sickle Cell Disease n (%)

P value

95% CI (Difference)

Hb A

40 (50%)

4 (5%)

0.002

45-55%

Hb S

8 (10%)

40 (50%)

<0.001

40-60%

Hb F

32 (40%)

36 (45%)

0.045

35-45%

Hb A2

40 (50%)

12 (15%)

<0.001

45-55%

Table 4 contrasts the prevalence of hemoglobin variants between thalassemia and sickle cell disease, highlighting the differences that may assist in differential diagnosis. Hemoglobin A is predominantly found in thalassemia patients (50%) compared to sickle cell patients (5%), and Hemoglobin S is more typical of sickle cell disease (50%) than thalassemia (10%). Both Hemoglobin F and A2 display differing prevalences that are statistically significant, helping delineate the two disorders in a clinical setting. These differences are quantified with P values indicating strong statistical significance and confidence intervals that underscore the disparities between these two hemoglobinopathies.

Discussion

Table 1: Evaluation and Comparison of Hemoglobin Variants in Thalassemia vs. Sickle Cell Disease

The differences in hemoglobin variants observed in our study are significant and align with established findings in hematological research. Our results show a pronounced prevalence of Hemoglobin S in sickle cell disease, which is a hallmark of the disease due to the mutation in the HBB gene resulting in abnormal hemoglobin that polymerizes under hypoxic conditions Adeyemo T et al.(2014)[9]. This finding is consistent with the high percentages reported in literature, emphasizing the pathophysiological distinction from thalassemia, where Hemoglobin A predominates Lee YK et al.(2019)[10]. The presence of higher Hemoglobin F in thalassemia patients compared to those with sickle cell disease supports existing research suggesting its role in ameliorating the severity of these disorders by inhibiting sickle hemoglobin polymerization and compensating for reduced beta-globin chain synthesis in beta-thalassemia Mohamad AS et al.(2018)[11].

Table 2: Specific Hemoglobin Variants in Thalassemia

The distribution of hemoglobin variants such as Hb A, Hb F, and Hb A2 within thalassemia patients is well-documented Barrera‐Reyes PK et al.(2019)[12]. The high frequency of Hb A and Hb A2 in our study reflects the typical pattern seen in beta-thalassemia carriers, where Hb A2 levels are elevated as a compensatory mechanism for the reduced beta-chain production. The presence of Hb H and Hb Bart's further corroborates with alpha-thalassemia, where gene deletions lead to excess unmatched beta globin chains forming beta4 tetramers (Hb H) and gamma4 tetramers (Hb Bart's) in more severe forms McGann PT et al.(2017)[13].

Table 3: Specific Hemoglobin Variants in Sickle Cell Disease

Our findings of the predominance of Hb S in sickle cell disease patients are consistent with global observational studies Fonseca SF et al.(2015)[14]. The significant presence of Hb F in these patients also aligns with therapeutic targets of hydroxyurea, which increases Hb F production as a treatment modality in sickle cell disease, demonstrating its protective effect against sickling episodes Franco E et al.(2024)[15].

Table 4: Comparison of Hemoglobin Variants Between Thalassemia and Sickle Cell Disease

The comparative analysis between thalassemia and sickle cell disease reveals distinct profiles, crucial for differential diagnosis. The marked difference in Hb S and Hb A levels between the diseases reflects their underlying genetic differences and helps in guiding appropriate treatment strategies. These findings are in line with previous research which highlights the importance of characterizing hemoglobin profiles for accurate diagnosis and management of hemoglobinopathies Serjeant GR. (2022)[16].

Conclusion

The cross sectional study has provided critical insights into the distinct hemoglobin profiles characteristic of thalassemia and sickle cell disease, two major hemoglobinopathies with significant global health impact. Our findings delineate clear differences in hemoglobin variants between these two disorders, which are crucial for accurate diagnosis and subsequent management.

In thalassemia, the elevated levels of Hemoglobin A and A2 and the presence of Hb H and Hb Bart's underscore the disease's nature of impaired hemoglobin production, predominantly due to beta-globin chain abnormalities or alpha-globin gene deletions. Conversely, the predominance of Hemoglobin S in sickle cell disease highlights the pathological consequence of the beta-globin gene mutation leading to abnormal hemoglobin polymerization under hypoxic conditions. Additionally, the comparative analysis of Hemoglobin F levels between the diseases illustrates its role in modulating disease severity and offers a therapeutic target in sickle cell disease management.

This study not only reinforces the importance of specific hemoglobin variant analysis in the differential diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies but also emphasizes the potential for targeted therapies that exploit these differences. The significant statistical associations and confidence intervals reported provide robust support for using these biomarkers in clinical settings to guide treatment strategies effectively.

Overall, the detailed evaluation of hemoglobin variants through high profile liquid chromatography presented in this study contributes to the body of knowledge necessary for advancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient outcomes in populations affected by these challenging genetic blood disorders. Future research should continue to focus on expanding the understanding of hemoglobin variants in diverse populations and exploring innovative therapeutic approaches based on these findings.

LIMITATIONS OF STUDY
  1. Cross-Sectional Design: As a cross-sectional study, the research captures data at a single point in time, which limits the ability to ascertain causality or track changes in hemoglobin variants over time. Longitudinal studies are needed to observe the progression of these diseases and the long-term effects of various treatments.
  2. Sample Size: With a total sample size of 80, split equally between patients with thalassemia and sickle cell disease, the study may not have adequate power to detect small differences in less common hemoglobin variants. A larger sample size would improve the statistical power and generalizability of the findings.
  3. Geographical Limitation: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations with different ethnic backgrounds and genetic predispositions to hemoglobinopathies.
  4. Selection Bias: The inclusion of patients based on a clinical diagnosis and previous hemoglobin electrophoresis might introduce selection bias, affecting the representation of the entire spectrum of each disease.
  5. Exclusion Criteria: Excluding patients who had received a blood transfusion in the three months prior to the study might have excluded a subgroup of patients with severe forms of the diseases, potentially skewing the severity and range of hemoglobin variants observed.
  6. Confounding Variables: The study did not control for several potential confounding variables such as age, gender, nutritional status, or the presence of other medical conditions, which could influence hemoglobin levels and variant expression
REFERENCES
  1. Mansoori H, Asad S, Rashid A, Karim F. Delta beta thalassemia: a rare hemoglobin variant. Blood research. 2016 Sep 23;51(3):213.
  2. Brancaleoni V, Di Pierro E, Motta I, Cappellini MD. Laboratory diagnosis of thalassemia. International Journal of laboratory hematology. 2016 May;38:32-40.
  3. Fasano RM, Meier ER, Chonat S. Sickle cell disease, thalassemia, and hereditary hemolytic anemias. Rossi's Principles of Transfusion Medicine. 2022 Aug 23:326-45.
  4. Arishi WA, Alhadrami HA, Zourob M. Techniques for the detection of sickle cell disease: a review. Micromachines. 2021 May 5;12(5):519.
  5. Fasano RM, Chou ST. Red blood cell antigen genotyping for sickle cell disease, thalassemia, and other transfusion complications. Transfusion medicine reviews. 2016 Oct 1;30(4):197-201.
  6. Fasola FA, Babalola OA, Brown BJ, Odetunde A, Falusi AG, Olopade O. The effect of alpha thalassemia, HbF and HbC on haematological parameters of sickle cell disease patients in Ibadan, Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases. 2022 Jan 1;14(1):e2022001.
  7. Elsayid M, Owaidah NE, AlFawaz N, Namnakani H, Malibary W, Sannan NS. Measurement of Hemoglobin Variants in Hemoglobinopathies. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine. 2022 Jan;13(1):26-30.
  8. Higgins V, MacNeil L, Sosova I, Ridsdale R, Bruce A, Brinc D, David W, Rara J, Bordeleau P, Estey MP, Parker ML. Hemoglobin variant in disguise. Clinical Biochemistry. 2023 Aug 1;118:110589.
  9. Adeyemo T, Ojewunmi O, Oyetunji A. Evaluation of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pattern and prevalence of beta-thalassaemia trait among sickle cell disease patients in Lagos, Nigeria. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2014 May 22;18:71.
  10. Lee YK, Kim HJ, Lee K, Park SH, Song SH, Seong MW, Kim M, Han JY. Recent progress in laboratory diagnosis of thalassemia and hemoglobinopathy: a study by the Korean Red Blood Cell Disorder Working Party of the Korean Society of Hematology. Blood research. 2019 Mar 31;54(1):17-22.
  11. Mohamad AS, Hamzah R, Selvaratnam V, Yegapan S, Sathar J. Human hemoglobin G-Makassar variant masquerading as sickle cell anemia. Hematology reports. 2018 Sep 24;10(3):7210.
  12. Barrera‐Reyes PK, Tejero ME. Genetic variation influencing hemoglobin levels and risk for anemia across populations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2019 Aug;1450(1):32-46.
  13. McGann PT, Nero AC, Ware RE. Clinical features of β-thalassemia and sickle cell disease. Gene and Cell Therapies for Beta-Globinopathies. 2017:1-26.
  14. Fonseca SF, Amorim T, Purificação A, Gonçalves M, Boa-Sorte N. Hemoglobin A2 values in sickle cell disease patients quantified by high performance liquid chromatography and the influence of alpha thalassemia. Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia. 2015;37(5):296-301.
  15. Franco E, Karkoska KA, McGann PT. Inherited disorders of hemoglobin: A review of old and new diagnostic methods. Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases. 2024 Jan 1;104:102758.
  16. Serjeant GR. Phenotypic variation in sickle cell disease: the role of beta globin haplotype, alpha thalassemia, and fetal hemoglobin in HbSS. Expert Review of Hematology. 2022 Feb 1;15(2):107-16.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Drug Utilization of Pattern of Antihypertensive Drugs at Tertiary Care Teaching Center
Published: 30/12/2024
Review Article
Evidence based evaluation of syncope of uncertain origin
...
Published: 28/07/2019
Review Article
Perineal Necrotizing Fasciitis
Published: 28/12/2017
Research Article
The Association of NCF1 Gene with the Severity of Malaria
...
Published: 28/03/2017
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright CME Journal Geriatric Medicine