Introduction: Objective:The present study is designed to evaluate the tissue immunoexpression of CD 133 in cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and normal oral mucosa to determine its role as a potential biomarker in oral malignancy and premalignancy. Materials and Methods:A total of 70 subjects comprising cases of OSCC (N=30), OPMDs (N=30) and Healthy individuals (N=10) were included. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. CD133 immunoreactivity was noted, compared among the study participants and statistically analysed at p<0.05 via SPSS version 20.Results:Strong to moderate levels of immunoexpression was observed in cases of OSCC (N=23;76.67%) followed by OPMDs (N=19; 63.34%). Absence of CD133 was observed in the normal oral mucosal specimens of healthy individuals. A highly significant (p<0.0001) difference was observed while comparing the tissue immunoexpressionof CD133 among the study participants. Conclusion:Varied expression of CD133 was observed in tissue samples of OSCC as compared to OED tissue samples of OPMDs and normal oral mucosa of healthy individuals. Immunohistochemical assessment of CD133 revealed that it can be of clinical importance for differentiating between OSCC, OPMDs and and normal oral mucosa thus can be used as a predictive marker in oral malignancy and premalignancy. The immunohistochemical expression of CD133 in OSCC, OPMDs, and normal oral mucosa also sheds light on the potential function of CD133 in the genesis and progression of oral cancer.
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is a form of cancer that impacts the cells covering the inside of the mouth such as the lips, tongue, gums, and inner cheeks. It is currently the most prevalent type of head and neck cancer globally, and its incidence has risen over the past years. The prognosis for OSCC depends on the stage at which it is detected, with earlier detection leading to better outcomes (Atia, 2019).Early detection and treatment of OSCC are challenging since healthcare resources are scarce in many parts of the country (Ali & Mirza, 2019). A group of diseases known as oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) has the potential to develop into oral cancer (Warnakulasuriya et al., 2021). At the time of first diagnosis or in the future, these diseases are defined as having a probability of development of malignancy in a lesion. Oral lichen planus (OLP), oral erythroplakia (OE), oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL), oral leukoplakia (OL), and actinic cheilitis (AC) are subtypes of OPMDs (Lorini et al., 2021).
The survival rate for patients with OSCC has not improved considerably in recent years, despite breakthroughs in cancer therapy. The lack of specific prognostic markers it is difficult to predict a bad prognosis for this disease (Asio et al., 2018). Scientists have investigated several molecular and genetic markers related to OSCC to pinpoint potential signs of a dismal prognosis. The heterogeneity of oral cancer, both between patients and within tumors, presents a difficulty in the search for meaningful prognostic indicators. Genetic and epigenetic variations in cancer cells within a tumor, as well as differences in the tumor microenvironment, can lead to tumor heterogeneity.
Glycoprotein CD133 (also known as prominin-1) was initially identified in hematopoietic stem cells but has now been found to be expressed in many different types of cancers, including OSCC, colon cancer, and gliomas (Gisina et al., 2021). Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to be responsible for tumor origin, progression, and recurrence (Caspa Gokulan & Devaraj, 2021). CD133 expression has been employed as a marker to identify the cells in these malignancies. The expression of CD133 has been found to increase gradually from normal mucosa to dysplasia and subsequently to OSCC, suggesting that it may play a role in the development and progression of oral cancer (Cierpikowski et al., 2021). In addition, the expression of CD133 is related to a higher risk of recurrence in OSCC patients, making it a crucial target for predicting the behavior of cancer (Hanet al., 2022).
Early diagnosis of OSCC and its premalignant forms is the key to improve the survival rate of OSCC and prevent the risk of conversion of oral potentially malignant lesions into
The study included seventy (N=70) tissue samples consisting of 30 cases of OSCC and OPMDs each and 10 normal oral mucosa samples. The ethical approval for the study was given by the institutional review board (IRB) of Prime Foundation Pakistan (IRB Approval No: Prime/IRB/2022-509). The study was conducted from 2nd May 2022 to 30th July, 2022 and data was collected from Department of Histopathology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, Pakistan, Department of Pathology, Pathology, Peshawar Medical College (PMC) and Department of Oral Pathology, Peshawar Dental College(PDC), Peshawar, Pakistan.
The normal oral mucosa was collected from 10 healthy persons visiting the mentioned dental units for minor surgical procedures, such as the removal of the third molar, alveoloplasty, and implant placements.
H&E staining confirmed the diagnosis of OPMDs and OSCC in the tissue samples, while CD133 staining was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (GLUT-4 Polyclonal Antibody, Host-Rabbit, Iso type-IgG;Elabscience, USA INCLUDE CD133 details like I have included GLUT 4 datails as an example ),using a semiquantitative scoring system.
Histopathological review of H & E stained slides
Histopathological grading of OSCC
The WHO grading system was adopted to classify the OSCC lesions into, Well differentiated (WDSCC), moderately differentiated (MDSCC) and poorly differentiated (PDSCC) types on the basis of degree of cellular differentiation ( WHO 2017 book-El-Naggar, Chan, Grandis, Takata, &Slootweg, 2017).Bryne’s invasive tumourfront grading system was used to assess the degree of malignancy of OSCC lesions by determining the degree of keratinisation, nuclear polymorphism, number of mitoses, mode of invasion and lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. Each histopathological features were assigned score (1-4) and were categorized into 3 grades [Grade-I (5-8 score), Grade-II (9-12 score) and grade 3 (13-20)] (Bryne et al., 1989;Dissanayake, 2017).
Histopathological grading of OPMD’s
WHO’s 2017 classification system of epithelial precursor lesions ( WHO 2017 book) was adopted for categorization of OPMDs. According to this system OPMDs were classified as mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia, severe dysplasia. OED was assessed from architectural and cytological alterations (El-Naggar, Chan, Grandis, Takata, &Slootweg, 2017). Binary system of OED was adopted and cut off point of 4 architectural and 5 cytological fetures were employed to classify OED as a high risk lesion (those who have a potential for malignant transformation) and a low risk lesion (those who donot have the potential for malignant transformation) (Kujan et al., 2006).
Evaluation of CD133 immunohistochemical staining for OSCC and OPMD’s
|
Points |
Intensity |
Percentage of Positive Cells |
|
0 |
No Staining |
0 |
|
1 |
Weak |
1-10 |
|
2 |
Moderate |
11-50 |
|
3 |
Strong |
51-80 |
|
4 |
Severe |
> 80 |
The IHC staining intensity was scored by an expert pathologist (ASK). No cytoplasmic staining or cytoplasmic staining in <10% of tumor cells was defined as score 0; faint/barely perceptible partial cytoplasmic staining in >10% of tumor cells was defined as score 1+; moderate cytoplasmic staining in >10% of tumor cells was defined as score 2+; strong cytoplasmic staining in >10% was defined as score 3+. Scores of 0 and 1+ were defined as low GLUT-4 expression while scores of 2+ and 3+ were defined as high GLUT-4 expression (Chang et al., 2017).
Statistical analysis
The data were analysed using SPSS version 20. The percentages were calculated for each categorical variable. ANOVA, chi-square test and Fisher exact tests were applied for statistical significance, where appropriate. A probability value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The results of the present study are summarized in the tables (Tables:1-4) given below, with essential descriptions. The average ages of the OSCC patients, OPMD patients and healthy individuals were 58.27, 61.23 and 37.10 respectively. Most of the cases of OSCC and OPMDs were older than 50 years. Among the cases of OSCC, the patients’ age ranged from 28-84 . In OSCC cases, the M: F ratio was 1:1.5, OPMDs 1:0.875, and that in healthy control was 1:1. A statistically significant relation (p=0.00003) was detected between the different age groups of the study participants (Table-1).
Table-1: Description of age, gender and tissue CD133 immunoreactivity of the study subject.
|
Study variables |
Study groups |
p-value* |
||
|
OSCC (N=30) |
OPMDs (N=30) |
Healthy subjects (N=10) |
||
|
Age |
||||
|
Minimum age in years |
28 |
43 |
21 |
0.00003^ |
|
Maximum age in years |
84 |
86 |
81 |
|
|
Mean±SD |
58.27±14.14 |
61.23±11.05 |
37.10±19.42 |
|
|
|
N(%) |
N(%) |
N(%) |
|
|
Age groups ( in years) |
|
|||
|
20-40 |
2(6.7) |
1(3.3) |
6(60) |
0.0003* |
|
41-50 |
8(26.7) |
5(16.7) |
2(20) |
|
|
51-60 |
7(23.3) |
9(30) |
1(10) |
|
|
>60 |
13(43.3) |
15(50) |
1(10) |
|
|
Gender |
||||
|
Male |
12(40) |
16(53.3) |
5(50) |
0.574* |
|
Female |
18(60) |
14(46.7) |
5(50) |
|
|
M:F |
1:1.5 |
1:0.875 |
1:1 |
|
|
^=ANOVA, *=Chi square |
||||
Comparing the CD 133 expression with the site of OSCC lesion (p=0.057), WHO grading system (p=0.274), ITF grading system (p=0.577) and LPI (p=0.323) showed statistically non significant relation between them (Table 2). Moderate CD133 expression was detected in the buccal mucosa, retromolar area and vestibule of the mouth of OSCC cases (N=6; 20%). Most of the lesions diagnosed as WDSCC (N=7, 23.3%) exhibited moderate CD133 immunoexpression (Table 2).
Table- 2: CD133 Immunoreactivityandclinico-pathological parameters of OSCC
|
Clinico-pathological Features |
CD 133 Immunoreactivity |
Total |
Statistics |
|||
|
ICD-10 Code |
Site of development of OSCC lesions |
Mild |
Moderate |
Strong |
p- value* |
|
|
C00 |
Lip |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
0.057 |
|
C01 |
Base of tongue |
1(3.3) |
5(16.7) |
1(3.3) |
7(23.3) |
|
|
C02 |
Other parts of tongue |
0(0) |
3(10) |
2(6.7) |
5(16.7) |
|
|
C03 |
Gum |
0(0) |
0(0) |
2(6.7) |
2(6.7) |
|
|
C04 |
Floor of mouth |
2(6.7) |
3(10) |
0(0) |
5(16.7) |
|
|
C05 |
Palate |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
|
|
C06 |
Cheek mucosa, vestibule of mouth, retromolar area |
3(10) |
6(20) |
0(0) |
9(30) |
|
|
WHO Grading System |
||||||
|
WDSCC |
4(13.3) |
6(20) |
0(0) |
10(33.3) |
0.274 |
|
|
MDSCC |
2(6.7) |
7(23.3) |
2(6.7) |
11(36.7) |
||
|
PDSCC |
1(3.3) |
5(16.7) |
3(10) |
9(30) |
||
|
Invasive tumor front grading system |
||||||
|
G1 |
3(10) |
6(20) |
0(0) |
9(30) |
0.577 |
|
|
G2 |
2(6.7) |
5(16.7) |
2(6.7) |
9(30) |
||
|
G3 |
2(6.7) |
7(23.3) |
3(10) |
12(40) |
||
|
Grades of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate |
||||||
|
Marked (Continuous rim) |
0(0) |
8(26.7) |
1(3.3) |
9(30) |
0.323 |
|
|
Moderate (Many large patches) |
2(6.7) |
1(3.3) |
1(3.3) |
4(13.3) |
||
|
Slight (A few patches) |
4(13.3) |
8(26.7) |
3(10) |
15(50) |
||
|
None (No infiltration found) |
1(3.3) |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
2(6.7) |
||
|
*Chi square test |
||||||
CD 133 tissue immunoexpression and clinical presentation of the OPMDs (p=0.40), site of OPMDs (p=0.885), binary grading system (p=0.217) , subepithelial inflammatory changes (p=0.49) and grades of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate (p=0.866) were not significantly related (Table-3). Buccal mucosa, retromolar area and vestibule of the mouth, showed moderate CD133 expression (N=8; 26.7%). Moderate and severe dysplasia showed moderate CD133immuno expression. Statistically significant relationship was observed between CD 133 tissue immunoexpression and WHO grading system for OED ( p=0.007) [Table-3].
Table 3:CD133 Immunoreactivity and clinico-pathological parameters among OPMD’s
|
Clinico-pathological features |
CD 133 Immunoreactivity |
Total |
Statistics |
||
|
Mild |
Moderate |
Strong |
p-value |
||
|
Clinical presentation of OPMD’s |
|||||
|
Oral Leukoplakia |
4(13.3) |
7(23.3) |
0(0) |
11(36.7) |
0.40* |
|
Oral Erythroplakia |
0(0) |
5(16.7) |
2(6.7) |
7(23.3) |
|
|
Lichen planus |
7(23.3) |
4(13.3) |
0(0) |
11(36.7) |
|
|
Speckled leukoplakia |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
|
|
Site of OPMD’s |
|||||
|
Lip |
1(3.3) |
2(6.7) |
0(0) |
3(10) |
0.885* |
|
Tongue |
2(6.7) |
3 |
0(0) |
5(16.7) |
|
|
Gum |
1(3.3) |
2(6.7) |
0(0) |
3(10) |
|
|
Floor of mouth |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
|
|
Palate |
0(0) |
2(6.7) |
0(0) |
2(6.7) |
|
|
Buccal mucosa, vestibule of mouth, retromolar area |
6(20) |
8(26.7) |
2(6.7) |
16(53.3) |
|
|
Histological description of OPMD’s |
|||||
|
WHO Grading system of OED |
|||||
|
Mild dysplasia |
5(16.7) |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
6(20) |
0.007* |
|
Moderate dysplasia |
6(20) |
8(26.7) |
0(0) |
14(46.7) |
|
|
Severe dysplasia/CIS |
0(0) |
8(26.7) |
2(6.7) |
10(33.3) |
|
|
Binary grading system of OED |
|||||
|
High risk dysplasia |
5(16.7) |
12(40) |
2(6.7) |
19(63.3) |
0.217* |
|
Low risk dysplasia |
6(20) |
5(16.7) |
0(0) |
11(36.7) |
|
|
Description of subepithelial Inflammatory infiltrate |
|||||
|
Inflammatory infiltrate observed |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
0.49* |
|
No infiltration observed |
10(33.3) |
17 |
2(6.70 |
29 |
|
|
Grades of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate |
|||||
|
No infiltration seen (-) |
1(3.3) |
0(0) |
0(0) |
1(3.3) |
0.866* |
|
Slight (+) - a few patches seen |
1(3.3) |
2(6.7) |
0(0) |
3(10) |
|
|
Moderate (++) - many large patches seen |
3(3.3) |
7(23.3) |
1(3.3) |
11(36.7) |
|
|
Marked (+++)-continuous rim seen |
6(20) |
8(26.7) |
1(3.3) |
15(50) |
|
|
*Chi-square test |
|||||
Among the cases (OSCC & OPMDs), moderate level of CD133 immuno-expression of was detected in 60% (N=18/30) of the tumor samples and 56.67% (N=17/30) in oral preneoplastic samples. Absence of CD 133 immuno-expression was noted in all (N=10) the samples of Normal oral mucosa. Statistical comparison made between CD133 immunoexpression among the study participants revealed significant difference thus rejecting the null hypothesis in favour of alternate hypothesis (Table-4).
Table-4: CD133 tissue immunoreactivity among the study participants
|
CD133 Immunoreactivity |
Study subjects |
Total |
p-value |
||
|
OSCC (N=30) N(%) |
OPMD (N=30) N(%) |
Normal oral mucosa (N=10) N(%) |
|||
|
Mild |
7(23.22) |
11(36.67) |
0(0.00) |
18(25.71) |
<0.001* |
|
Moderate |
18(60.00) |
17(56.67) |
0(0.00) |
35(50.00) |
|
|
Strong |
5(16.67) |
2(6.67) |
0(0.00) |
7(10.00) |
|
|
Nil |
0(0.00) |
0(0.00) |
10(100.00) |
10(14.28) |
|
|
Total |
30(100.00) |
30(100.00) |
10(100.00) |
70(100.00) |
|
|
*Chi-square test |
|||||
There is a need for trustworthy biomarkers that can assist in the early detection and prognosis of oral cancer, as current diagnostic methods and prognostic indicators have limitations. The expression of CD133 has been proposed as a prognostic factor in OSCC and has emerged as a possible CSC marker in numerous human cancers. Therefore, to evaluate its potential clinical significance as a biomarker and therapeutic target, this study was conducted to examine the immunohistochemical expression of CD133 in OSCC, OPMDs, and normal oral mucosa.
(Hasegawa et al., 2015).
The present study revealed a greater incidence of oral OSCC and OPMDs in males compared to females. This points to a gender-based discrepancy, with OPMDs and OSCC being more prevalent among males in our study population. The high occurrence of these conditions in males can be attributed to the increased frequency of harmful habits among this demographic. The literature presents conflicting views on the prevalence of OPMDs in both genders.(Yardimci, Kutlubay, Engin, & Tuzun, 2014) A study conducted in India also reported a higher occurrence of OPMDs in males.(Srivastava, Sharma, Pradhan, Jyoti, & Singh, 2020)
In our study most of OPMD and OSCC cases occurred in the age group 41 – 60 years. The findings from a previous study indicate that, traditionally, the average age of individuals diagnosed with potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity (OPMDs) is typically within the range of 50 to 69 years. This age range has been considered as the primary demographic for the occurrence of these disorders. However, recent research indicates that approximately 5% of cases involving OPMDs have been documented in individuals who are under the age of 30 years(Ray, 2017).
Our findings show that the most prevalent site among the OSCC cases was the buccal mucosa, comprising 40% of the total cohort, followed by the tongue at 18.33%. The results of this study differ from previous research conducted in Pakistan, where the tongue was identified as the site most frequently affected by OSCCs, accounting for 37.1% of cases, followed closely by the buccal mucosa at 30.3%. Another study conducted in Mexico by Hernandez-Guerrero et al.(Hernández-Guerrero et al., 2013)also supported the tongue as the predominant site of involvement, reporting a frequency of 44.7%. However, contrasting findings were reported by Bhurgri in South Karachi, where the buccal mucosa took precedence, being the most frequently involved site in oral malignancies at 55.9%, followed by the tongue at 28.4%(Bhurgri, 2005). These variations in site preference are not unique to a specific region but can be observed globally. For instance, in Iraq, the lip is identified as the preferential site for individuals exposed to ultraviolet radiation(Nemes, Redl, Boda, Kiss, & Márton, 2008), while in Hungary, the floor of the mouth is reported as the most frequently affected site in OSCC patients (Nemes et al, 2008). In another study, the higher prevalence of OSCC on the alveolar ridge was attributed to the practice of snuff (Sahaf et al., 2017). This habit, combined with periodontitis, contributes to the formation of soft tissue craters. These craters create an environment conducive to the accumulation of snuff deposits over an extended duration, thereby increasing the risk of developing OSCC on the alveolar ridge. This highlights the localized impact of specific risk factors on the anatomical distribution of OSCC, emphasizing the importance of considering regional practices and habits in understanding the patterns of oral cancer incidence.
The results of a previous study have provided valuable insights into the distribution and nature of OPMDs. According to this study, the most frequently affected site for OPMDs was identified as the buccal mucosa. This finding suggests that the buccal mucosa, which is the inner lining of the cheek, is particularly prone to the development of these potentially precancerous conditions. The significance of pinpointing the most common site for OPMDs lies in enhancing targeted surveillance and early detection efforts, especially in clinical examinations focusing on the buccal mucosa(Saboor, Khan, Afsar, & Khan, 2023). Furthermore, the study identified Leukoplakia as the most prevalent premalignant lesion within the OPMD category which appearsas whitish, thickened patches on the oral mucosa. This information is crucial for clinicians and researchers in prioritizing monitoring and intervention strategies for individuals exhibiting these leukoplakic patches(Dissemond, 2004).
We concluded that there was a strong CD133 expression in OSCC as compared to OPMDs. The normal oral mucosa was negative for CD133 expression.
Previous studies showed a significant association between CD133+CSCs and OSCCs, particularly those of more advanced stages. This suggests the potential involvement of CD133+ CSCs in the transformative process of premalignant oral lesions, as indicated by studies conducted by Ravindran and Devaraj in 2012(Ravindran & Devaraj, 2012), and Liu et al. in 2013(Liu et al., 2013). Moreover, there is notable evidence pointing to the presence of CSCs expressing CD133 in the majority of oral epithelial dysplasias (OEDs) that have progressed to malignant transformation and developed into OSCCs, as highlighted by Liu et al. in 2013(Liu et al., 2013). This underscores the role of CD133 as a valuable predictor, serving to identify oral premalignant lesions that carry a heightened risk of progressing into oral cancer. The presence of CD133+ CSCs in both OSCCs and premalignant lesions suggests its potential utility as a biomarker for assessing the risk and prognosis of oral cancer development.
Despite extensive literature research, we could not find any comparable study on CD133 expression among various grades of OSCC. However, in our study, most of the MDSCC and PDSCC showed moderate to strong CD133 expression as compared to WDSCC. This finding though not statistically significant can help us in predicting the behaviour of the tumor.
The immunohistochemical expression of CD133 in OSCC and OPMDs. CD133 has been identified as a putative CSC marker in several human malignancies, including OSCC. Its expression has been suggested as a prognostic factor in OSCC, with several studies reporting a significant association between CD133 expression and poor survival outcomes. Furthermore, CD133 has been proposed as a therapeutic target for OSCC, with several studies demonstrating the potential efficacy of CD133-targeted therapies in preclinical models. In addition to its potential clinical implications in OSCC, detecting CD133 expression in OPMDs may help identify high-risk lesions with potential for malignant transformation. CD133 expression has been reported in both oral leukoplakia and oral erythroplakia, two common types of OPMDs, and its detection may aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of these lesions. The expression of CD133 in normal oral mucosa also suggests that it may play a role in normal tissue homeostasis. However, the significance of CD133 expression in normal oral mucosa is not fully understood and requires further investigation.
Overall, the potential clinical implications of CD133 expression in OSCC, OPMDs, and normal oral mucosa may serve as a valuable biomarker for the early detection and treatment of oral cancer. Furthermore, CD133-targeted therapies may hold promise as a novel treatment approach for OSCC and other cancers. However, the limitations to using CD133 as a biomarker and therapeutic target need to be considered, such as the potential lack of specificity to CSCs and the heterogeneity of CSC populations. Further research is required to fully understand the biological and clinical significance of CD133 expression and its potential limitations as a biomarker and therapeutic target.
Limitations
It was a time-bound study. The study included a relatively small sample size of 70 patients, which might limit the generalizability of the findings. With a small sample, the results may not accurately represent the entire population, and there is an increased risk of chance associations. The study did not include comprehensive information on potential risk factors associated with OSCC and OPMDs, such as smoking habits, alcohol consumption, or HPV infection. The absence of these variables limits the ability to explore potential risk factors for these conditions. The study provided cross-sectional data, which does not allow for assessing changes or developments over time. Longitudinal data would provide a more comprehensive understanding of disease progression and treatment outcomes. As the study relies on data from patients attending specific medical and dental centers, there might be selection bias, as patients attending these centers may have different characteristics than the general population.
Strength of the study
The relationship of CD133 expression and Bryne’s ITF grading system of OSCC , Binary grading system of OPMDs, subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate and its grades, were assessed for the first time in the international literature according to our knowledge.
Based on our findings, it can be concluded that, All the OSCC, and OPMD cases were positive for CD133 expression as compared to normal oral mucosa . OSCC cases showed a higher percentage of moderate and strong CD133 expression than OPMDs.Among various grades of OSCC, MDSCC and PDSCC showed more intense CD133 expression as compared to WDSCC.CD133 can be used as a predictor for invasiveness in OSCC and OPMDs.
Recommendations and future directions
A large-scale study with a diverse population from multiple centers should be conducted to enhance the generalizability of the findings. A more extensive sample size will provide more robust statistical power to detect associations accurately. To further substantiate the possible role of CD133 in OSCC and OPMDs,follow-up of patients is recommended. To develop new approaches to the treatment. Incorporate molecular studies to examine genetic and epigenetic changes associated with OSCC and OPMDs. Molecular markers can enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve understanding of disease mechanisms. Conduct validation studies on CD133 as a biomarker for OSCC and OPMDs using independent datasets. Validation will confirm the reliability and clinical utility of CD133 as a potential prognostic and diagnostic marker.Based on the findings of risk factors, develop effective prevention strategies, public health campaigns, and educational programs to reduce the incidence of OSCC and OPMDs. Encourage collaboration between clinicians, pathologists, molecular biologist, and researchers to foster interdisciplinary research in oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders. Such collaboration can lead to more comprehensive and innovative diagnosis, treatment, and prevention approaches. Promote public awareness about the early signs and symptoms of OSCC and OPMDs and the importance of regular oral health check-ups .Further research is required to find the relation of CD133 expression in serum and saliva besides samples of OSCC and OPMDs.