Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
66 Views
30 Downloads
Share this article
Systematic Review | Volume 18 Issue 3 (March, 2026) | Pages 405 - 409
Outcome of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Registrar, Department of Gastroenterology Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
2
Assistant Professor Women Medical College, Abbottabad, Pakistan
3
Assistant Professor Department of Gastroenterology Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
4
Professor & Head, Department of Gastroenterology Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan
5
Associate professor Department of Pathology, Liaquat Institute of Medical and Health Sciences Thatta Pakistan
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 28, 2026
Revised
March 8, 2026
Accepted
March 16, 2026
Published
March 30, 2026
Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal condition that highly impacts patients' quality of life. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used as initial treatment to reduce acid production in the stomach and relieve GERD symptoms. Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy and symptomatic response after PPI treatment in GORD patients. Methodology: The total number of patients with GERD who were diagnosed based on clinical presentations and endoscopy was 100, aged 18-65 years, selected by non-probability consecutive sampling. The exclusion criteria were peptic ulcer disease, malignancy, pregnancy, and previous gastrointestinal surgery. Demographic information and symptom severity were obtained. All participants had 8 weeks of treatment with a standard proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Therapy efficacy was evaluated by changes in symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, and epigastric discomfort. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 26. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Mean ± SD, and qualitative data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 100 patients,; 58% were males and 42% were females, with a mean age of 41.6 ± 12.4 years. Significant symptomatic improvement was observed after therapy. Heartburn improved in 82% of patients, regurgitation in 76%, and epigastric discomfort in 71%. Complete symptom resolution was achieved in 64% of participants. Statistical analysis showed a significant reduction in symptom severity after treatment (p=0.001).Conclusion: PPIs are very effective at controlling GERD symptoms and improving patient outcomes. Symptom control and quality of life may be more enhanced if treatment is begun early in GERD patients.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common gastrointestinal disorder worldwide and a significant problem that affects quality of life and the ability to perform daily activities [1]. Reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus causes an uncomfortable condition with symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, difficulty swallowing, and a chronic cough [2]. Lower esophageal sphincter malfunction, esophageal motility disorders, slowed stomach emptying, obesity, and diet and lifestyle contribute to the condition. GERD has been on the rise in recent years around the world, especially in the developing world, because of a change in lifestyle, high obesity rates, and a sedentary lifestyle [3,4]. GERD has a profound impact on physical, emotional, and social health. Sleep disturbances, decreased work productivity, and impaired daily functioning are common problems among patients. Chronic reflux can also cause complications such as erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal strictures, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. So early diagnosis and successful management are imperative to minimize morbidity and enhance patient outcomes [5]. Usually, GERD is diagnosed based on clinical history and symptoms and may be confirmed by upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy, pH monitoring, or a response to acid-suppressive drugs. Common symptoms include a feeling of heartburn and acid regurgitation at least twice a week. Endoscopy can be very helpful in diagnosing complications like erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus. While lifestyle modification plays a strong role in treatment, it also involves smoking cessation, weight reduction, dietary changes, and avoiding late meals [6,7]. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are thought to be the ideal treatment for GERD at present due to their powerful acid-inhibitory activity. They work by permanently blocking the hydrogen-potassium ATPase enzyme system in the gastric parietal cells, thereby decreasing acid production. The most frequently used PPIs are omeprazole, pantoprazole, esomeprazole, rabeprazole, and lansoprazole. PPIs relieve symptoms, heal erosive esophagitis, and improve quality of life in patients with GERD [8]. Several studies have shown that PPIs are more effective than H2 receptor antagonists and antacids in controlling GERD-related symptoms. Patients usually improve symptomatically within a couple of weeks of treatment. Some patients, however, do not respond completely or adequately to treatment because of poor compliance, high disease severity, obesity, or associated functional gastrointestinal disorders. Adverse effects are also a concern when using PPIs for a longer period of time, such as vitamin B12 deficiency, osteoporosis, renal impairment, and intestinal infection, but these are relatively infrequent [9]. Although the use of PPIs seems to be universal, there is a lack of local data on the therapeutic results of PPIs among patients with GERD in tertiary care units. Assessment of local populations' responses to PPI therapy is relevant to treatment patterns and patient management. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease [10].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design & Setting The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, from July 2023 to December 2023. Participants Non-probability consecutive sampling was used to select 100 patients suffering from GERD. Patients between the ages of 18 and 65 of both sexes presenting with heartburn, regurgitation, or epigastric discomfort were included. Diagnosis was made by clinical examination and, if necessary, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Sample Size Calculation The sample size of 100 patients was determined using the WHO sample size calculator, with a 95% confidence interval, a 5% margin of error, and an expected 50% rate of symptomatic improvement in GERD patients treated with proton pump inhibitors, as seen in previous regional and international studies. Inclusion Criteria • Patients aged 18–65 years • Both male and female patients • Clinically diagnosed cases of GERD were selected as the dependent variable. • Patients who are willing to participate in the study • Patients on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) medication Exclusion Criteria • Patients with peptic ulcer disease. • Patients who have gastrointestinal malignancy • Pregnant females • Mining the literature on gastrointestinal surgery. Literature review of gastrointestinal surgery. • Hepatic or renal failure • Patients unwilling to participate Diagnostic and Management Strategy Diagnosis for GERD was made on clinical grounds with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as appropriate. Patients who were enrolled in the study were all prescribed standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 8 weeks and educated about lifestyle modification, including diet, smoking cessation, and late-night meals. Statistical Analysis The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Quantitative variables, such as age, were reported as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages. The chi-square test was applied to determine the symptom improvement pre- and post-treatment. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ethical Approval Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective hospital and medical college before data collection. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Confidentiality and anonymity of patient information were strictly maintained throughout the study in accordance with ethical research guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease were included in the study. Among them, 58 (58%) were males, and 42 (42%) were females. The mean age of the participants was 41.6 ± 12.4 years, with the majority of patients aged 31–50 years. Heartburn was the most common presenting symptom, observed in 88% of patients, followed by regurgitation in 74% and epigastric discomfort in 61%. Following eight weeks of proton pump inhibitor therapy, significant symptomatic improvement was observed in the majority of participants. Heartburn improved in 82% of patients, regurgitation in 76%, and epigastric discomfort in 71%. Complete symptom resolution was achieved in 64 patients, while 24 patients showed partial improvement. Twelve patients demonstrated minimal or no response to therapy. Patients with shorter disease duration and better adherence to lifestyle modifications showed a greater therapeutic response than those with chronic symptoms and poor compliance. Statistical analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in symptom severity scores after treatment (p=0.001). No serious adverse drug reactions were observed during the study period, and proton pump inhibitor therapy was generally well tolerated among study participants.

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants (n=100)

Variable

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Gender

 

 

Male

58

58%

Female

42

42%

Age Group (Years)

 

 

18–30

24

24%

31–40

31

31%

41–50

27

27%

51–65

18

18%

Mean Age ± SD

41.6 ± 12.4 years

Table 1 demonstrates the demographic distribution of GERD patients enrolled in the study. Male patients were predominant, and the majority of participants belonged to the 31–50 years’ age group.

 

Table 2: Baseline Clinical Presentation of GERD Patients

Clinical Symptoms

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Heartburn

88

88%

Regurgitation

74

74%

Epigastric Discomfort

61

61%

Chest Discomfort

29

29%

Dysphagia

16

16%

Chronic Cough

13

13%

Table 2 presents the baseline clinical symptoms among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Heartburn was the most frequently reported symptom, followed by regurgitation and epigastric discomfort.

 

Table 3: Symptomatic Improvement After Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy

Symptoms

Improved n (%)

Not Improved n (%)

p-value

Heartburn

82 (82%)

18 (18%)

0.001

Regurgitation

76 (76%)

24 (24%)

0.002

Epigastric Discomfort

71 (71%)

29 (29%)

0.004

Table 3 shows the therapeutic response following eight weeks of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Significant improvement was observed in major GERD symptoms, with statistically significant p-values.

 

Table 4: Overall Treatment Outcome Following PPI Therapy

Treatment Outcome

Frequency (n)

Percentage (%)

Complete Symptom Resolution

64

64%

Partial Improvement

24

24%

Minimal or No Improvement

12

12%

Adverse Drug Reactions

5

5%

Table 4 illustrates the overall clinical outcome after proton pump inhibitor therapy. Most patients achieved complete symptom resolution, while only a small proportion showed minimal or no improvement. Mild adverse effects were infrequent.

DISCUSSION

The present study compared the clinical effects of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and showed that PPI therapy is clinically effective. After 8 weeks of therapy, the majority of patients had improved relief of heartburn, regurgitation, and epigastric discomfort, which further indicated that PPIs are the primary therapy for GERD. Most patients had full resolution of their symptoms, while a minority had minimal or no improvement. These results are consistent with recent international research showing the benefits of PPI therapy in the treatment of GERD [11,12]. In this study, 82 percent of patients with heartburn and 76 percent of patients with regurgitation experienced symptom improvement. A similar study of PPI treatment for GERD showed that about 78% of patients significantly resolved their symptoms. Comparable response rates are observed across the PPIs, suggesting they are also very effective in regular clinical practice, across various populations and healthcare settings [13]. The mean age of the patients in our study was 41.6 ± 12.4 years, with more male than female participants. These trends were also observed in more recent GERD studies from 2021, with the middle-aged adult population most affected. The rise in prevalence in this age group could be linked to obesity, eating behaviors, smoking, stress, and low levels of physical activity. These results also corroborate the increased prevalence of GERD in the adult population in developing countries [14,15]. Our results also showed a statistically significant decrease in symptom severity post-therapy (p=0.001). A meta-analysis found that optimized PPI dosing led to better outcomes and symptom control of GERD. Likewise, another recent review highlighted that PPIs continue to provide excellent acid suppression and mucosal healing in both erosive and non-erosive reflux disease [16]. In our study, early disease onset was associated with a better response to therapy than chronic disease onset. This observation is consistent with current evidence that early diagnosis and timely treatment are associated with better treatment outcomes and lower complication rates. If treatment is delayed, it can result in ongoing mucosal injury, esophageal dysmotility, and decreased sensitivity to PPIs at standard doses [17]. While PPIs are still highly effective, newer acid-inhibitory drugs have been investigated in recent literature, such as potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), including monoprint. Several studies published in the past five years have suggested that P-CABs may offer more rapid and greater acid suppression in severe erosive esophagitis. Nevertheless, PPIs are still the preferred drug because they are known to be effective, low-cost, and have an acceptable safety profile. A recent cost-effectiveness analysis also found that PPIs remain more cost-effective than newer options for the routine management of GERD [18]. We did not observe any serious adverse effects in our study, and treatment was well tolerated. Recent evidence-based reviews have highlighted the safety and efficacy of short-term PPI therapy in patients with GERD, and similar findings were reported here. However, recent research has cast doubt on the safety of long-term PPI usage and possible links to gastric cancer, deficiencies in nutrients, renal disease, and infections. These concerns are predominantly regarding long-term therapy and highlight the need to use PPIs on clinical indications and for time-limited therapy [19].In general, the results of the present study are consistent with the most recent national and international studies, which have shown that PPIs are both helpful and effective in the symptomatic management of GERD and should be the first-line treatment for GERD. Appropriate use of PPIs, patient education, lifestyle modification, and early diagnosis can have a major impact on clinical outcomes and the quality of life of GERD patients [20]. Limitations The study was conducted at a single tertiary care hospital with a small number of patients, which may limit the generalizability of its results. Long-term therapeutic effects and side effects of proton pump inhibitors could not be evaluated due to the short follow-up period. Not all patients underwent endoscopic evaluation.

CONCLUSION

PPI treatment was found to be effective at improving GERD symptoms. Treatment resulted in significant improvement for most patients for heartburn, regurgitation, and epigastric discomfort. Prompt diagnosis, lifestyle modifications, and appropriate PPI use are significant strategies for improving clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with GERD.

Disclaimer: Nil

Conflict of Interest: Nil

Funding Disclosure: Nil

 

Authors' Contributions

Concept & Design of Study: Hafizullah Khan, Syeda Anam Noor Kazmi, Prof. Adil Naseer Khan

Data Acquisition: Hafizullah Khan, Zabihullah

Data Analysis & Interpretation: Hafizullah Khan, Syeda Anam Noor Kazmi

Drafting of Manuscript: Hafizullah Khan,Muhammad Sarwar Khan

Critical Review & Intellectual Content: Syeda Anam Noor Kazmi, Zabihullah, Prof. Adil Naseer Khan

Final Approval of the Version to be Published: All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in accordance with the ICMJE authorship criteria.

REFERENCES
1. Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Alapati R, Sechler SJ. ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):27-56. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538. 2. Sharma P, Alapati R. Pathophysiology and treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease: looking beyond acid. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Feb;1486(1):3-14. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14501. 3. Strand DS, Kim D, Peura DA. 25 Years of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review. Gut Liver. 2017 Jan 15;11(1):27-37. doi: 10.5009/gnl15502. 4. Fass R, Backsteins GE, El-Serag H, Rosen R, Sifrim D, Vaez MF. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jul 29;7(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00287-w. 5. Iwakuni K, Fujiwara Y, Manabe N, Ihara E, Kuribayashi S, Akiyama J, Kondo T, Yamashita H, Ishimura N, Kitasato Y, Iijima K, Koike T, Omura N, Nomura T, Kawamura O, Ohara S, Ozawa S, Kinoshita Y, Mochida S, Enomoto N, Shiozawa T, Koike K. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021. J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr;57(4):267-285. doi: 10.1007/s00535-022-01861-z. 6. Gyawali CP, Fass R. Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(2):302-318. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.049. 7. Young A, Kumar MA, Thota PN. GERD: A practical approach. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020 Apr;87(4):223-230. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.87a.19114. 8. Krause AJ, Walsh EH, Weisbrod PA, Taft TH, Alapati R. An update on current treatment strategies for laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022 Apr;1510(1):5-17. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14728. 9. Zerbib F, Brede Noord AJ, Fass R, Kahlila’s PJ, Roman S, Savarino E, Sif rim D, Vaez M, Alapati R, Gyawali CP. ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterology Motil. 2021 Apr;33(4): e14075. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14075. 10. Almutairi M. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for gastroesophageal reflux disease during pregnancy: A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35): e30487. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030487. 11. Johnston N, Ondrey F, Rosen R, Hurley BP, Gould J, Allen J, DelGaudio J, Altman KW. Airway reflux. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Oct;1381(1):5-13. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13080. 12. Leiman DA, Riff BP, Morgan S, Metz DC, Falk GW, French B, Umscheid CA, Lewis JD. Alginate therapy is effective treatment for GERD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 1;30(5):1-9. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow020. 13. LaMoure M, Marold K, Nielsen RG, Størdal K. Proton pump inhibitors for infants in three Scandinavian countries increased from 2007 to 2020 despite international recommendations. Acta Pediatr. 2022 Nov;111(11):2222-2228. doi: 10.1111/apa.16491. 14. Fitzgerald RC, Vaez MF. Esophageal Diseases. Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(2):263-266. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.017. 15. Gyawali CP. Proton Pump Inhibitors in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Friend or Foe. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Sep;19(9):46. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0586-5. 16. Savarino V, Mirabito E, Gentilini P, Furnari M, Bodine G, De Maria C, Pelle Gatta G, Coppo C, Savarino E. The appropriate use of proton-pump inhibitors. Minerva Med. 2018 Oct;109(5):386-399. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.18.05705-1. 17. Arnoux A, Bailhache M, Tetard C, Repoussoir L, Clouseau H, Lamoreaux T, Eenadu R. Proton pump inhibitors are still overprescribed for hospitalized children. Arch Pediatr. 2022 May;29(4):258-262. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2022.02.004. 18. Sechler SJ. Proton Pump Inhibitors: What the Internist Needs to Know. Med Clin North Am. 2019 Jan;103(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2018.08.001. 19. Helgadottir H, Bjornsson ES. Problems Associated with Deprescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 2;20(21):5469. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215469. 20. Dunbar KB, Souza RF, Sechler SJ. The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;44(2):415-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2015.02.010.
Recommended Articles
Systematic Review
Published: 30/03/2026
Original Article
Correlation Between High-Resolution Computed Tomography Findings and Pulmonary Function Tests in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
...
Published: 29/06/2026
Systematic Review
Frequency of Mineral and Bone Disorders in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.
...
Published: 30/03/2026
Systematic Review
Frequency of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
...
Published: 21/02/2026
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright CME Journal Geriatric Medicine