Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
69 Views
45 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 17 Issue 12 (None, 2025) | Pages 94 - 96
Cardiovascular Adaptations to Graded Exercise in Trained versus Untrained Adults: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Analysis of Stroke Volume, Cardiac Output, and Recovery Kinetics
 ,
1
Research Scholar Department of Physiology Index Medical College Hospital and Research Center Malwanchal University
2
Supervisor Professor Department of Physiology Index Medical College Hospital and Research Center Malwanchal University.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Nov. 7, 2025
Revised
Nov. 26, 2025
Accepted
Dec. 4, 2025
Published
Dec. 26, 2025
Abstract

Background: Endurance training induces profound remodeling of the cardiovascular system. However, comparative data simultaneously evaluating stroke volume, cardiac output, and post-exercise recovery kinetics across trained and untrained adults during graded exercise remain limited. Objective: To evaluate resting, peak, and submaximal cardiovascular parameters and recovery kinetics in trained versus untrained healthy adults using a standardized graded exercise testing protocol. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional design enrolled 60 healthy adults (30 trained, 30 untrained; age 18–35 years). Stroke volume was measured by Doppler echocardiography; cardiac output was calculated as SV × HR. Graded treadmill testing was performed to volitional fatigue, with continuous ECG monitoring. Heart rate recovery (HRR) was assessed at 1-minute post-exercise. Results: Trained individuals demonstrated significantly lower resting HR (58.4 ± 6.3 vs 74.8 ± 7.2 bpm; p < 0.001), higher resting SV (92.6 ± 10.5 vs 70.2 ± 8.4 mL; p < 0.001), and superior peak cardiac output (24.0 ± 2.8 vs 18.9 ± 2.1 L/min; p < 0.001). HRR at 1 minute was 50 ± 7 vs 30 ± 6 bpm (p < 0.001). Resting cardiac output was comparable between groups (p = 0.21), reflecting hemodynamic compensation. Conclusion: Trained adults exhibit coordinated central cardiovascular adaptation characterized by resting bradycardia, enhanced stroke volume, augmented maximal cardiac output, and superior autonomic recovery. These findings reinforce the physiological basis for cardiorespiratory fitness as a preventive health biomarker.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Regular endurance training induces structural and functional remodeling of the cardiovascular system, manifesting as lower resting heart rates, enlarged ventricular chambers, enhanced stroke volume, and improved autonomic regulation. These adaptations collectively define the trained cardiovascular phenotype and confer both performance and health advantages.

 

Central to understanding these adaptations is the Fick equation, which defines oxygen consumption (VO₂) as the product of cardiac output and the arteriovenous oxygen difference. Among the determinants of cardiac output—heart rate and stroke volume—stroke volume is disproportionately enhanced by endurance training, particularly through eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy and improved diastolic compliance.

 

Despite a rich literature on individual cardiovascular parameters, comparative studies simultaneously capturing resting, submaximal, peak, and recovery responses within a single standardized protocol remain limited. Furthermore, heart rate recovery (HRR), an established index of post-exercise parasympathetic reactivation and an independent cardiovascular mortality predictor, is seldom integrated alongside echocardiographic stroke volume measurements.

 

The objective of the present study was therefore to comprehensively evaluate cardiovascular adaptations during graded exercise in trained and untrained healthy adults, with particular emphasis on stroke volume, cardiac output, submaximal efficiency, and post-exercise recovery kinetics.

METHODS

2.1 Study Design and Participants A comparative cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in the Exercise Physiology Laboratory. Sixty healthy adults (30 trained, 30 untrained) aged 18–35 years were enrolled. Trained participants engaged in structured endurance exercise ≥5 days/week for ≥2 years; untrained participants performed <2 sessions/week for the preceding 12 months. Inclusion required normotension (BP < 130/85 mmHg), BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m², non-smoking status, and absence of cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic disorders. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Sample size was estimated based on expected VO₂ max differences (Cohen's d = 0.8, power = 80%, α = 0.05), yielding a minimum of 26 per group; 30 per group were enrolled to account for attrition. 2.2 Exercise Protocol A standardized graded treadmill protocol was employed: 3-minute warm-up followed by incremental speed and incline increases every 3 minutes to volitional fatigue or ≥85% predicted maximal HR. Participants abstained from strenuous activity (24 h), caffeine/alcohol (12 h), and consumed a light meal ≥3 hours pre-test. Recovery monitoring continued for 10 minutes post-exercise. 2.3 Cardiovascular Measurements Continuous 12-lead ECG provided beat-to-beat heart rate. Stroke volume was estimated by Doppler echocardiography using the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter and velocity-time integral: SV = π × (LVOT diameter/2)² × VTI. Cardiac output was calculated as CO = SV × HR. Heart rate recovery was defined as the change in HR from peak exercise to 1 minute into recovery. 2.4 Statistical Analysis Data are reported as mean ± SD. Between-group differences were assessed by independent t-test following Shapiro–Wilk normality testing. Effect sizes were calculated as Cohen's d. Pearson correlations assessed cardiorespiratory coupling. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Analysis was performed in SPSS version XX.

RESULTS

3.1 Demographic Characteristics

Groups were well-matched at baseline with no significant differences in age (24.6 ± 3.2 vs 25.1 ± 3.5 years; p = 0.56), height (170.4 ± 6.1 vs 169.2 ± 5.8 cm; p = 0.48), weight (66.8 ± 7.4 vs 68.1 ± 8.2 kg; p = 0.42), or BMI (22.9 ± 1.8 vs 23.8 ± 2.1 kg/m²; p = 0.08), ensuring group comparability.

 

Table 1. Resting Cardiovascular Parameters

Parameter

Trained (n=30)

Untrained (n=30)

p-value

Resting HR (bpm)

58.4 ± 6.3

74.8 ± 7.2

<0.001*

Stroke Volume (mL)

92.6 ± 10.5

70.2 ± 8.4

<0.001*

Cardiac Output (L/min)

5.4 ± 0.6

5.2 ± 0.7

0.21

SBP (mmHg)

112 ± 8

118 ± 10

0.02*

DBP (mmHg)

72 ± 6

76 ± 7

0.03*

* Statistically significant (p < 0.05). HR = heart rate; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure.

 

Table 2. Peak Exercise and Recovery Cardiovascular Parameters

Parameter

Trained (n=30)

Untrained (n=30)

p-value

Peak HR (bpm)

178 ± 8

186 ± 7

<0.01*

Peak Stroke Volume (mL)

135 ± 14

102 ± 12

<0.001*

Peak Cardiac Output (L/min)

24.0 ± 2.8

18.9 ± 2.1

<0.001*

Submaximal HR – Stage 2 (bpm)

118 ± 10

142 ± 12

<0.001*

HR at 1-min Recovery (bpm)

128 ± 9

156 ± 11

<0.001*

HR Recovery Δ (bpm)

50 ± 7

30 ± 6

<0.001*

* Statistically significant (p < 0.05). HR = heart rate; Δ = delta (change from peak).

DISCUSSION

The present study provides comprehensive evidence of superior central cardiovascular adaptation in trained adults across rest, exercise, and recovery phases. The most clinically important finding was the markedly higher heart rate recovery in trained individuals (50 ± 7 vs 30 ± 6 bpm; p < 0.001), reflecting enhanced parasympathetic reactivation post-exercise. Delayed HRR has been established as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, lending clinical relevance to this observation.

Resting bradycardia in trained individuals, consistent with extensive literature on endurance athletes, reflects augmented vagal tone and diminished sympathetic dominance. The elevated resting stroke volume (92.6 vs 70.2 mL) is attributable to eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy and improved diastolic compliance via the Frank–Starling mechanism—structural adaptations well-documented in longitudinal echocardiographic studies of endurance athletes.

 

The preserved resting cardiac output across groups (5.4 vs 5.2 L/min; p = 0.21) is a key mechanistic insight: lower heart rate in trained individuals is compensated by higher stroke volume to maintain equivalent perfusion at rest. This hemodynamic balance explains the observed cardiovascular economy.

 

At peak exercise, trained individuals achieved a cardiac output of 24.0 L/min versus 18.9 L/min in untrained participants—a 27% difference representing substantially enhanced convective oxygen delivery capacity. This finding aligns with Joyner and Green's model identifying maximal cardiac output as the primary determinant of VO₂ max.

 

The significantly lower submaximal HR in trained individuals at equivalent workload (118 vs 142 bpm) reflects greater physiological economy. Since most daily activities occur at submaximal intensities, this efficiency reduces cumulative myocardial workload and likely contributes to the lower long-term cardiovascular disease risk consistently observed in physically active populations.

CONCLUSION

Trained adults demonstrate a coordinated cardiovascular adaptation profile characterized by resting bradycardia, augmented stroke volume, superior maximal cardiac output, improved submaximal efficiency, and accelerated post-exercise heart rate recovery. These findings confirm that regular endurance training induces multifaceted central cardiovascular remodeling with significant implications for exercise performance and cardiovascular health. The preserved resting cardiac output in trained individuals, achieved via compensatory stroke volume elevation, represents a paradigmatic example of physiological efficiency. Clinicians and exercise physiologists should consider integrated cardiovascular assessment—including HRR and stroke volume—as part of comprehensive cardiorespiratory fitness evaluation. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest. FUNDING This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

REFERENCES

[1] Joyner MJ, Green DJ. Exercise protects the cardiovascular system: effects beyond traditional risk factors. J Physiol. 2009;587(23):5551–5558.

[2] Scharhag J, et al. Athlete's heart: right and left ventricular mass and function in male endurance athletes and untrained controls. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(10):1856–1863.

[3] Cole CR, et al. Heart-rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(18):1351–1357.

[4] Baggish AL, Wood MJ. Athlete's heart and cardiovascular care of the athlete. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2723–2735.

[5] Pluim BM, et al. The athlete's heart. A meta-analysis of cardiac structure and function. Circulation. 2000;101(3):336–344.

 

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article
Visceral Adiposity as an Independent Determinant of Cardiopulmonary Fitness in Normoglycaemic Adults with Familial Risk for Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study
Published: 30/12/2025
Research Article
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Remimazolam Versus Propofol in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
...
Published: 24/12/2022
Research Article
A Cadaveric Study on the Variations of the Branching Pattern of Arch of Aorta
...
Published: 27/02/2026
Research Article
PREVALENCE OF MOOD DISORDERS IN PATIENTS WITH ADULT ADHD
...
Published: 31/03/2026
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright CME Journal Geriatric Medicine