Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
161 Views
7 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 2 Issue 1 (Jan- Jun, 2010) | Pages 35 - 38
Clinical Profile and Management Outcomes of Ocular Sarcoidosis - A One-Year Study
 ,
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
2
Associate Professor, Department for Ophthalmology, Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 2, 2010
Revised
Feb. 15, 2010
Accepted
Feb. 23, 2010
Published
Feb. 28, 2010
Abstract

Background: Ocular sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease that can result in severe visual impairment if not diagnosed and treated early. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic indicators, treatment modalities, and outcomes in patients with ocular sarcoidosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients (50 eyes) diagnosed with ocular sarcoidosis were enrolled in this prospective study conducted at Narayana Medical College, Nellore, between January 2009 and December 2009. Patient demographics, clinical features, ocular signs, laboratory investigations, and treatment outcomes were assessed over a follow-up period of 6 months. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The mean age of the patients was 34.9 years, with a predominance of female patients (62.5%). Defective vision was the most common symptom (95%), followed by pain (60%). Ocular signs included granulomatous keratic precipitates (92.5%) and anterior chamber reaction (90%). Systemic investigations revealed bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy in 50% of the patients. The majority of patients were treated with topical steroids (100%), and 90% received oral steroids. At the 6-month follow-up, 37.5% showed improvement in visual acuity, while 12.5% experienced deterioration. Conclusion: Ocular sarcoidosis presents predominantly with defective vision and inflammatory signs such as granulomatous keratic precipitates and anterior chamber reaction. Early diagnosis and treatment, primarily with steroids, are critical for improving visual outcomes. However, long-term management remains essential due to potential recurrence and complications.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Ocular sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disorder that primarily affects the eyes and is commonly associated with systemic sarcoidosis, a condition characterized by the formation of noncaseating granulomas in various organs, most frequently the lungs and lymph nodes. It is the second most common manifestation of sarcoidosis after pulmonary involvement, and it can result in significant morbidity if not adequately managed.

 

The clinical presentation of ocular sarcoidosis is highly variable, with symptoms ranging from mild irritation to severe visual impairment. Common ocular manifestations include uveitis, optic neuropathy, and retinal involvement, which can lead to chronic inflammation, irreversible damage, and vision loss if untreated. In fact, uveitis is the most common presentation, and it has been reported that up to 25% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis will experience ocular involvement during the course of their disease (1).

 

The diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis is challenging due to the lack of a specific biomarker, and it often requires a comprehensive evaluation involving detailed clinical history, slit-lamp examination, imaging, and histopathological confirmation of granulomatous inflammation. Although some studies have proposed diagnostic criteria, there is still no universally accepted guideline (2).

 

Treatment primarily focuses on controlling inflammation and preventing vision-threatening complications, with corticosteroids being the cornerstone of therapy. In more severe cases, steroid-sparing agents such as methotrexate and azathioprine may be employed (3).

 

The long-term prognosis of ocular sarcoidosis varies, with many patients achieving good visual outcomes if treated promptly and adequately, while others may experience chronic inflammation and complications, such as cataract formation and glaucoma. Moreover, the management of ocular sarcoidosis requires multidisciplinary collaboration between ophthalmologists and other specialists, given the potential for systemic involvement and the need for coordinated care (4- 6).

 

This study aims to examine the clinical profile and management outcomes of ocular sarcoidosis, focusing on the demographic characteristics, common ocular manifestations, treatment protocols, and the long-term visual prognosis of affected individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ocular sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disorder that primarily affects the eyes and is commonly associated with systemic sarcoidosis, a condition characterized by the formation of noncaseating granulomas in various organs, most frequently the lungs and lymph nodes. It is the second most common manifestation of sarcoidosis after pulmonary involvement, and it can result in significant morbidity if not adequately managed.

 

The clinical presentation of ocular sarcoidosis is highly variable, with symptoms ranging from mild irritation to severe visual impairment. Common ocular manifestations include uveitis, optic neuropathy, and retinal involvement, which can lead to chronic inflammation, irreversible damage, and vision loss if untreated. In fact, uveitis is the most common presentation, and it has been reported that up to 25% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis will experience ocular involvement during the course of their disease (1).

 

The diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis is challenging due to the lack of a specific biomarker, and it often requires a comprehensive evaluation involving detailed clinical 

RESULTS

The study included 40 patients (50 eyes) diagnosed with ocular sarcoidosis, with a mean age of 34.9 years and a predominant female representation (62.5%). The most common age group was 31-40 years (42.5%), and bilateral involvement was observed in 25% of cases. The clinical presentation was characterized by defective vision, which was seen in 95% of patients, followed by pain (60%), redness (50%), and photophobia (30%).

 

Table 1: Demographic characteristics and visual acuity at the time of presentation

Variable

Frequency (n = 40)

Age (in years)

<21 years

3 (7.5%)

21-30 years

8 (20%)

31-40 years

17 (42.5%)

41-50 years

6 (15%)

51-60 years

4 (10%)

>60 years

2 (5%)

Gender

Males

15 (37.5%)

Females

25 (62.5%)

Laterality

Left eye

13 (32.5%)

Right eye

17 (42.5%)

Bilateral involvement

10 (25%)

Visual acuity (n = 50)

6/6

24 (48%)

6/6 - 6/12

12 (24%)

6/18 - 6/36

4 (8%)

6/60 and below

10 (20%)

 

Ocular signs, including granulomatous keratic precipitates (92.5%) and anterior chamber reaction (90%), were highly prevalent, with grade 3 reactions being the most common. Iris nodules were observed in 37.5% of the cases, and vitritis, with snowballs, was noted in half of the eyes.

 

 

 

Table 2: Clinical Profile

Clinical features      

Frequency (n = 40)

Symptoms

Defective vision

38 (95%)

Pain

24 (60%)

Redness

20 (50%)

Photophobia

12 (30%)

Floaters

10 (25%)

Ocular signs

Granulomatous keratic precipitates

37 (92.5%)

Anterior chamber reaction

36 (90%)

Grade 1 anterior chamber reaction

5 (12.5%)

Grade 2 anterior chamber reaction

20 (50%)

Grade 3 anterior chamber reaction

23 (57.5%)

Iris nodules

15 (37.5%)

Peripheral anterior synechiae

5 (12.5%)

Posterior synechiae

6 (15%)

Vitritis

20 (50%)

Snowballs

15 (37.5%)

Snowbanking

2 (5%)

 

 

Radiologically, 50% of patients exhibited bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, while serum ACE was elevated in 30% of patients. Treatment was primarily corticosteroid-based, with 100% of patients receiving topical steroids, and 90% receiving oral steroids. The visual outcome at 6 months showed that 37.5% of patients had improved vision, while 50% had no change. However, 12.5% experienced deterioration, indicating that while the majority showed stability or improvement, some cases did not respond well to the treatment. This underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies in managing ocular sarcoidosis.

 

Table 3: Management and outcomes

Variable

Frequency (n = 40)

Investigations

Chest X-ray (bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy)

20 (50%)

Mantoux test (positive)

4 (10%)

Serum ACE (elevated)

12 (30%)

Liver function tests (altered)

 

Treatment

Topical steroids

40 (100%)

Periocular steroids

20 (50%)

Oral steroids

36 (90%)

Cycloplegics

30 (75%)

Immunosuppressants

6 (15%)

Visual outcomes at 6 months of treatment

Improved

15 (37.5%)

No change

20 (50%)

Deterioration

5 (12.5%)

DISCUSSION

This study was undertaken to analyze the clinical profile and treatment outcomes of ocular sarcoidosis over a one-year period at Narayana Medical College, Nellore. The results of this study align with findings from similar studies on ocular sarcoidosis, with common manifestations including defective vision, pain, redness, and photophobia. For instance, a study by Jabs et al. (1) reported that uveitis was the most frequent ocular manifestation, which is consistent with the high prevalence of uveitis observed in the present cohort. Furthermore, the predominance of female patients (62.5%) in this study mirrors the gender distribution found in study by Ianetti et al. (7), where women were more frequently affected by ocular sarcoidosis, though some studies report a more balanced gender ratio. The age distribution in the present study, with a peak in the 31-40 years group, is also similar to findings by Lee et al. (8), who noted a higher incidence of ocular involvement in adults aged 30-40 years.

 

However, some differences were noted. In this study, the proportion of patients with bilateral involvement (25%) was lower than the 50% observed by Mandeep et al. (9), which could be attributed to regional differences or variations in the study design. The visual acuity at the time of presentation also showed a noteworthy proportion (20%) of patients with significantly impaired vision (6/60 or below), which is higher compared to the findings of Tamer et al. (10), where the majority of patients had a relatively better visual acuity at presentation. This discrepancy might suggest variations in the severity or chronicity of the disease in different populations.

 

The management outcomes observed in the current study also reflect trends seen in other research. The use of corticosteroids as the first-line treatment, followed by immunosuppressive agents like methotrexate and azathioprine, aligns with treatment protocols described by Nishida et al.(11) and Sakamoto et al. (12) The improvement in visual acuity, as defined by a two-line gain on the Snellen chart, is consistent with the therapeutic success noted in studies like that of Gülmez et al. (13), where corticosteroid therapy demonstrated significant improvement in ocular sarcoidosis patients.

CONCLUSION

This study was undertaken to analyze the clinical profile and treatment outcomes of ocular sarcoidosis over a one-year period at Narayana Medical College, Nellore. The results of this study align with findings from similar studies on ocular sarcoidosis, with common manifestations including defective vision, pain, redness, and photophobia. For instance, a study by Jabs et al. (1) reported that uveitis was the most frequent ocular manifestation, which is consistent with the high prevalence of uveitis observed in the present cohort. Furthermore, the predominance of female patients (62.5%) in this study mirrors the gender distribution found in study by Ianetti et al. (7), where women were more frequently affected by ocular sarcoidosis, though some studies report a more balanced gender ratio. The age distribution in the present study, with a peak in the 31-40 years group, is also similar to findings by Lee et al. (8), who noted a higher incidence of ocular involvement in adults aged 30-40 years.

 

However, some differences were noted. In this study, the proportion of patients with bilateral involvement (25%) was lower than the 50% observed by Mandeep et al. (9), which could be attributed to regional differences or variations in the study design. The visual acuity at the time of presentation also showed a noteworthy proportion (20%) of patients with significantly impaired vision (6/60 or below), which is higher compared to the findings of Tamer et al. (10), where the majority of patients had a relatively better visual acuity at presentation. This discrepancy might suggest variations in the severity or chronicity of the disease in different populations.

 

The management outcomes observed in the current study also reflect trends seen in other research. The use of corticosteroids as the first-line treatment, followed by immunosuppressive agents like methotrexate and azathioprine, aligns with treatment protocols described by Nishida et al.(11) and Sakamoto et al. (12) The improvement in visual acuity, as defined by a two-line gain on the Snellen chart, is consistent with the therapeutic success noted in studies like that of Gülmez et al. (13), where corticosteroid therapy demonstrated significant improvement in ocular sarcoidosis patients.

REFERENCES
  1. Jabs DA, Rittenhouse KD, Nicholas P, et al. Ocular sarcoidosis: The National Eye Institute experience. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):37-47.
  2. Thomas J, Deka S, Sharma A, et al. Diagnostic criteria for ocular sarcoidosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):296-301.
  3. Shtein RM, Williams A, Goodman L, et al. Steroid-sparing agents in ocular sarcoidosis: A review of their efficacy and safety. J OculPharmacolTher. 2008;24(4):389-396.
  4. Wechsler ME, Silverstein DS, Feldman D, et al. Sarcoidosis and the eye: A comprehensive management approach. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2007;24(2):73-81.
  5. Baughman RP, Lower EE, du Bois RM. Sarcoidosis. Lancet. 2003;361(9363):1111-1118.
  6. deSmedt M, De Laey JJ, Smet S. Ocular manifestations of sarcoidosis: A review of the literature. SurvOphthalmol. 2006;51(6):559-576.
  7. Iannetti L, Galletti M, Nesti A, et al. Ocular sarcoidosis: A study of 76 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(6):758-763.
  8. Lee GH, Lim LS, Ocular sarcoidosis in a tertiary referral center. Int J Ophthalmol. 2005;3(2):123-128.
  9. Mandeep S, Verma S, Malik V, et al. Ocular manifestations of sarcoidosis: A comprehensive study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006;54(5):301-305.
  10. Tamer C, Ekinci G, Yalçin M, et al. The role of corticosteroids in ocular sarcoidosis. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(10):1869-1873.
  11. Nishida T, Kawashima Y, et al. Steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents in ocular sarcoidosis. Ophthalmic Res. 2007;39(3):144-149.
  12. Sakamoto T, Okamoto S, Yokoi H, et al. The management of ocular sarcoidosis: The role of immunosuppressive therapy. J ClinOphthalmol. 2007;29(3):200-205.
  13. Gülmez D, Yavuz S, Uzun S, et al. Ocular manifestations of sarcoidosis: A study of 45 patients. ActaOphthalmol Scand. 2007;85(2):234-2
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Assessment of Bowel Ultrasound among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients
...
Published: 18/08/2025
Research Article
Comparison of Paravertebral Block with Spinal Anaesthesia in Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair
Published: 07/06/2025
Research Article
An Analytical Case Control Study of The Risk Factors of Hepatitis B Among Rural Population in A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital
Published: 30/05/2024
Research Article
Assessment of Nutritional Status of Elderly Population in Rural Areas: A Community Based Cross Sectional Study
Published: 27/02/2024
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright CME Journal Geriatric Medicine